Asrock H67M-GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H67M-GE  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '17 at 22:15
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 188
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 465
51% 403 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 38.8
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 41
Splatting 34.3
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 521
Write 368
Mixed 409
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 14.9
75% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 15.7
45% 102 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72%
Great: 99%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 88.6
67% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.24
87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
91GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 93.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.54
108% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-051.A00LF 9905403-153.A00LF 99U5402-051.A00LF 9905403-153.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-GE Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-GE - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback