Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory152 GB free of 160 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191120
Uptime26.8 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 02:03
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 183
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 536
56% 450 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 193
Parallax 184
145% 185 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 187
Splatting 130
122% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,589
Write 2,880
Mixed 2,832
689% 3,100 MB/s
4K Read 240
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 95.5
532% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 441
328% 435 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
577GB free
Firmware: SBK00104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 555 561 564 555 566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,878
Write 529
Mixed 575
SusWrite 560
194% 885 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 18.3
109% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 282
261% 409 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 162%
Great: 394%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 133 137 133 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 145
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 134
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 141 142 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 139
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB
883GB free
Firmware: W7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 161 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 164
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB
216GB free
Firmware: W7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 127 133 124 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 114
Write 123
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 128
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
166% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Kingston 9965516-071.A0... 160GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $569
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback