Csl-computer 918

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemCsl-computer 918  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING B450-PLUS II
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 144
2-Core 277
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 831
84% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Palit(1569 F280) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3509 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 267
Parallax 217
180% 235 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 150
Splatting 115
120% 152 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lntenso SATAIII 1TB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.8 8.4 10 7 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 493
Write 434
Mixed 390
SusWrite 8.3
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 30
139% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 0.5
70% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.7
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 34.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 918 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO

System: Csl-computer 918

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback