Acer Aspire U5-610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire U5-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire U5-610
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 12:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 136
57% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 291
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 082E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 5.5
3% 12.7 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
476GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 389 399 409 420 425 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 354
Mixed 308
SusWrite 405
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 34.5
116% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 289
236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1A1600C11 Kingston 9905428-155.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 16.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire U5-610 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire U5-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback