Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4005U 37,483 User benchmarks, average bench 39% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 38.1 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 75.1 31% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 111 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0866) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1 2% 1.67 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD230S 128GB 2,263 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427GNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 57 53 43 46 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 386 Write 149 Mixed 200 SusWrite 50 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 23.6 89% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 49.5 63% 111 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 110%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 678GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 78 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 66.1 Write 70 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 77.1 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	583x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	182x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	155x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	40x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	38x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28