Asrock B365 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B365 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 21:14
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$429
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 285
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 999
95% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2197 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 131
Parallax 126
114% 132 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.1
92% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 728 183 201 233 133 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,468
Write 1,596
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 286
256% 1,145 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 48.3
187% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 804
595% 791 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 168%
Great: 237%
Team T2535T240G 240GB
26GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 8.1 31 52 45 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 459
Write 418
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 89
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.9
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
16% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
319GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 155 159 159 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 158
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 131 133 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 133
142% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
607GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 85.6
Write 87.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 89.2
100% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6J1 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $532
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback