Acer Aspire X3950

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3950 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire X3950
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100505
Uptime	15.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Memory 66.1 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 101 47% 75.6 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 142 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.8 1% 2 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 123 91 102 93 103 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.8% Below average	Read 182 Write 160 Mixed 121 SusWrite 114 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 10.6 52% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 43.1 DQ Mixed 17.9 28% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 55%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 272GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 89 87 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 87.9 Write 99.8 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 87.4 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 60%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 184GB free, PID 0579 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 24 24 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 58.7 Write 21 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 23.4 37% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL None F3-12800CL9-2GBXL Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Toshiba 9905458-010.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 12.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3950 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3950

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	59x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	30x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	24x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	46x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	18x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	17x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnifosaBench 35%, 775 samples	9x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	7x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBToshibaBench 29%, 236 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16