Acer Swift SF314-58G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-58G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Strongbow_CM
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 261
25% 208 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 6
4% 9.73 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.6
6% 7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 704 702 721 744 743 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,059
Write 1203
Mixed 1,114
SusWrite 736
232% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 51.8
167% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 318
245% 338 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 155%
Great: 203%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
745GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 99 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 101
Write 65.6
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 99.7
107% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-58G Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-58G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback