HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 191
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 298
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 357 282 133 143 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 325
Write 382
Mixed 317
SusWrite 233
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 33.7
120% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 135
119% 171 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: LIV6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 107
Write 96.3
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 102
68% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback