MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 339
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 1,083
106% 869 Pts
64-Core 1,508
93% 1,508 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 210
Parallax 204
188% 215 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 159
Splatting 131
141% 179 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 2TB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 683 305 344 269 176 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 459
Write 2,549
Mixed 161
SusWrite 323
200% 873 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 1
78% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 1,087
685% 758 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 382%
WD WD101EFBX-68B0AN0 10TB
875GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 120 125 126 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 110
Write 122
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 124
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.5
354% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 118%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
941GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 123 126 126 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 126
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
61GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 122 123 123 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 122
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 100%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 39.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
1TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 35.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 38.2
51% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 24.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 24.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 5,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C91) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $923
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback