MSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7680
MotherboardMSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 09:16
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 83.2
44% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 138
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 92.5
56% 76.9 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 50.2
53% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAN20102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 172 182 206 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 203
Write 184
Mixed 183
SusWrite 183
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 16.1
64% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 75.7
DQ Mixed 24.6
27% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-137.A00LF Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P23 (MS-7680) Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback