Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PH
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 08:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 74.5
25% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 192
23% 177 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200918
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 113 122 113 112 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 170
Write 159
Mixed 142
SusWrite 115
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 3.9
28% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 15.5
39% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 102 96 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 130
Write 147
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 98
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2666HLB-8G Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 618
6% 618 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2PH-CF Builds (Compare 689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $90
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback