Biostar B660MX-E PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar B660MX-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory91 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '23 at 01:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900-$273
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 208
2-Core 407
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,481
137% 1,144 Pts
64-Core 2,812
174% 2,812 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 10.2
7% 11 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 10
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,680
Write 2,154
Mixed 222
369% 1,685 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 106
392% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 734
DQ Write 1,404
DQ Mixed 477
530% 872 MB/s
Poor: 155% Great: 318%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0710
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 125
Mixed 82.3
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 95GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 34.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 31.3
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B660MX-E PRO Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar B660MX-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback