Dell XPS L501X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS L501X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 00CKNG
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 20:12
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 107
46% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 146
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 046E) 2.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.93 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 211 215 224 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 218
Write 208
Mixed 202
SusWrite 217
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 22.9
80% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 162
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 8502 PSD34G1333L2S 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS L501X Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS L501X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback