Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario WE230AA-ABE CQ5315ES (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ETON
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '23 at 10:08
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 46.1 34% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 49.4 8-Core 48.9 7% 49.2 Pts	64-Core 47.3 3% 47.3 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.6% Average	Lighting 59.2 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 59.6 48% 58.8 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 60.5 Splatting 54.3 49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 60 81 88 91 58 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.6% Poor	Read 120 Write 88.9 Mixed 119 SusWrite 75.1 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 13.6 47% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 52 DQ Mixed 30.1 25% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 121GB free Firmware: X41320RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 64 83 87 91 65 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 159 Write 167 Mixed 127 SusWrite 77.5 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 17.7 68% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 27.9 29% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 C7 2x2GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1333 C7 2x2GBKingstonBench 42%, 36 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $299

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16