Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 17:48
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 124
52% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 204
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2824
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 16
14% 15.4 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 12.8
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 249 244 245 247 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 501
Write 749
Mixed 577
SusWrite 292
120% 530 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 571
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 413
320% 444 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84%
Great: 131%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 92 91 93 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 67.2
Write 93
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 91.8
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback