Asrock H97 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 12:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 102
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 477
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 212
Parallax 206
190% 217 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 155
Splatting 136
131% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 139 143 116 156 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.7% Good
Read 178
Write 101
Mixed 232
SusWrite 154
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 32.9
122% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 187
161% 235 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 88%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
53GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 298 371 191 158 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 444
Write 252
Mixed 386
SusWrite 238
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 34.7
119% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 302
220% 282 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 95%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
240GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 88 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 80.9
Write 97.3
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 91.4
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
229GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 95.3
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 98.3
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 72%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
455GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 93 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63% Good
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 82
SusWrite 98
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Pro4 - $287

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $710
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback