Lenovo 82CG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82CG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220905
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '23 at 11:00
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 136
57% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 370
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FA2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 21.4 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NX-512 512GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09843
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,700
Write 1,621
Mixed 1,563
364% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 51.9
174% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 521
390% 527 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 282%
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
68GB free
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 139 144 118 220 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,059
Mixed 797
SusWrite 195
191% 861 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 10.2
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 83.4
DQ Mixed 224
165% 226 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 175%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: 0710
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 62.2
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart Brazil SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG Crucial CT8G4SFS8320.C8FD1 16GB
2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82CG Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82CG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback