Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3380M 2,989 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 42.5 1-Core 60 2-Core 97.2 39% 66.6 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 117 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 392.65 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.58% Terrible	Lighting 8.4 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 11.1 7% 9.67 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 10.1 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.58% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 960GB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 507GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 128 113 99 63 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 50 Write 61 Mixed 249 SusWrite 121 28% 120 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 15.3 66% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 38.9 DQ Mixed 129 95% 130 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 104%
Intenso SSD 256GB 696 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 163GB free Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 258 336 326 383 376 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 408 Write 308 Mixed 344 SusWrite 329 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 16.3 71% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 27.9 50% 97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 183 185 184 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 175 Mixed 108 SusWrite 184 220% 165 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1 424% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 12.2 DQ Mixed 0.9 448% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16