Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 22:51
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 158
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 502
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.5% Very good
Lighting 89.3
Reflection 121
Parallax 103
73% 104 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 104
81% 97.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
86GB free
Firmware: G871201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 169 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 460
Write 165
Mixed 218
SusWrite 169
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 27.9
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 170
145% 215 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 87%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
280GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 359 367 392 383 366 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 441
Write 362
Mixed 352
SusWrite 369
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 31.7
104% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 254
214% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 117%
SABRENT 1TB
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 1383 1437 1327 1034 1042 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback