Primeline Workstation-BTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPrimeline Workstation-BTO  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DB85FL
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 16:27
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 170
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 298
36% 275 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8678) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 38.9
33% 41 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW210415
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 150 139 135 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 444
Write 183
Mixed 344
SusWrite 142
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 14.8
91% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 20.2
60% 124 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-034.A00G Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 99U5403-034.A00G Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Workstation-BTO Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Primeline Workstation-BTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback