HP 500-140eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-140eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 14:24
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 522
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 38.6
31% 39.4 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 27.8
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 430
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 46.6
152% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 57.5
102% 207 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
219GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 425
Mixed 364
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 42.2
138% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 111
151% 275 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
882GB free
Firmware: HP34
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 191
Write 143
Mixed 84.6
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion SW 2TB
733GB free
Firmware: 1901
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.9
Write 26.1
Mixed 25.7
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
685GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 28 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 26.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 28.5
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA MK5075GSX 500GB
226GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.2
Write 24.6
Mixed 20.7
37% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1C1600C11 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-140eo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP 500-140eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $223
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback