Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 09:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 106
47% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 345
32% 269 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1202A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 206 130 182 189 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1922
Write 1,057
Mixed 1,002
SusWrite 254
234% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 27.9
140% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 426
353% 514 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 159%
Great: 243%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
256GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 63 63 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 42.7
Write 59.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 64.1
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 04CD F4-2666C18-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback