Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 09:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 429
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1202A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,888
Write 1,158
Mixed 994
297% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 27.7
142% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 433
358% 517 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 243%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
256GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 64 65 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 60.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 64.1
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 04CD F4-2666C18-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 17.4
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback