Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	19.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$123 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 67 1-Core 115 2-Core 232 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 524 63% 484 Pts	64-Core 624 39% 624 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 8.3 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.97 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 0.2 4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 130 41 19 4.7 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 434 Write 274 Mixed 296 SusWrite 38.9 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 32.2 113% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 55.5 63% 108 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 555GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 174 172 180 178 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 112 Mixed 87 SusWrite 176 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 113%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 114GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 21 22 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 62.9 Write 21.9 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 20.4 35% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.3 78% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.M16FE Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.9% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 12.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,193x
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	686x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	214x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	308x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	209x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	207x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	153x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	88x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	118x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16