Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 411 51% 388 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100 26,726 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Asus(1043 0496) CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 26.5 Parallax 28.6 18% 25.6 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 24.6 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 114 108 93 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 349 Write 99.4 Mixed 158 SusWrite 102 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 26.4 116% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 102 70% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 779GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 165 166 168 159 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 164 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KF3200C16D4/8GX 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 12.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	701x
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	568x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	365x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	197x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	194x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	163x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $343