ASUS Q87M-E/CSM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemASUS Q87M-E/CSM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131128
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 334
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$240
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 84
Parallax 102
86% 96.9 fps
MRender 81.8
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 66.9
60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 296 346 369 402 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 336
Write 318
Mixed 245
SusWrite 356
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 24
83% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 272
212% 294 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E/CSM Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: ASUS Q87M-E/CSM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback