Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS M (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220726
Uptime	16.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359 30,318 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 265 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 819 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 194 Parallax 133 124% 160 fps	MRender 170 Gravity 128 Splatting 111 109% 137 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,927 Write 2,153 Mixed 1,788 438% 1,956 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 68.8 244% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,303 DQ Write 986 DQ Mixed 1,097 833% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 223GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 218 164 107 105 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 477 Write 447 Mixed 427 SusWrite 192 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 31 150% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 49.5 103% 205 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 452GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 118 116 117 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 109 Write 117 Mixed 101 SusWrite 116 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 2x8GB 1,817 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 32.7 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 31.5 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 7,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,433x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,317x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	559x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	503x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	430x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	426x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	202x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	171x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	166x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	417x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	275x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	249x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16