Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 620 9,076 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 54.1 1-Core 44.1 2-Core 46.7 33% 48.3 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 54.2 6% 49.6 Pts	64-Core 72.3 4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Apple(106B 00C7) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.2 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 322GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 137 163 170 175 177 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 171 Write 171 Mixed 130 SusWrite 162 36% 158 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 18.8 54% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 56.4 DQ Mixed 31.8 27% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	19x

Value: 30% - Poor

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16