Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 352
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 156
Parallax 146
133% 155 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 127
Splatting 109
107% 134 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 410
Mixed 352
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 41.6
138% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WDC WD10EZEX-08WN4A0 256GB
91GB free
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 365 389 365 102 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 424
Write 387
Mixed 369
SusWrite 263
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 17.2
101% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 30.5
79% 161 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 94 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 130
Write 113
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 92.8
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
146GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 43 50 49 43 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 75.4
Write 91.8
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 46.3
50% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 62%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
189GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 81 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 80.4
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
313% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $765
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback