Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 23:44
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 244
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 381
53% 390 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 163
Parallax 154
138% 162 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 132
Splatting 113
112% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 369
Mixed 359
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 48.7
164% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WDC WD10EZEX-08WN4A0 256GB
91GB free
Firmware: U1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 398 427 429 180 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 457
Write 410
Mixed 387
SusWrite 307
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 20.8
116% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 31.7
85% 174 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 92 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 69
SusWrite 91
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
154GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 75 74 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 78
Write 88.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 69.2
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 62%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
193GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 91 91 92 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 90.9
Write 106
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 91.4
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
305% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback