ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82SB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Lenovo 82SB (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 77% FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 74.5 1-Core 163 2-Core 294 95% 177 Pts	4-Core 557 8-Core 892 89% 725 Pts	64-Core 1,079 67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU 38,648 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Legend(17AA 3AF8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2212 MHz, MLim: 3113 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.83 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 92.3 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 78.7 75% 85.1 fps	Gravity 66.7 Splatting 65.6 58% 66.1 fps
Poor: 36% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MGE1QDY 256GB 260 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.4L0630 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1437 1666 797 475 473 472 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,419 Write 1,189 Mixed 939 SusWrite 887 300% 1,358 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 85.2 276% 99.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,306 DQ Write 669 DQ Mixed 725 608% 900 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 263%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB 12,579 User benchmarks, average bench 380% 446GB free Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3524 3586 3625 3571 2911 340 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	503% Outstanding	Read 3,775 Write 3,357 Mixed 2451 SusWrite 2,926 702% 3,127 MB/s	4K Read 71.6 4K Write 235 4K Mixed 94.3 354% 134 MB/s	DQ Read 1,512 DQ Write 1,409 DQ Mixed 1,459 1,095% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 503% Great: 507%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 2x31.5GB 1,781 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	131% Outstanding	MC Read 47.6 MC Write 52 MC Mixed 46.1 139% 48.6 GB/s	SC Read 28.6 SC Write 52.4 SC Mixed 34.4 110% 38.5 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 163%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 82SB Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Lenovo 82SB

CPU
Ryzen 5 6600HAMDBench 77%, 1,386 samples	132x
Ryzen 7 6800HAMDBench 78%, 6,532 samples	42x
Ryzen 5 7535HS GraphicsAMDBench 82%, 2,625 samples	34x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 27%, 25,679 samples	117x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples	49x
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples	19x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GBIntelBench 190%, 3,651 samples	40x
LS KIOXIA 256GBKbg50znt256gBench 176%, 538 samples	35x
SSDPFINW512GZL 512GBSolidigmBench 188%, 457 samples	23x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 1x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 1,721 samples	35x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 1x8GBMicronBench 64%, 906 samples	31x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback