Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Memory 13 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 54.8 21% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 196 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 4.9 4% 4.7 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.8 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 112 32 72 89 35 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.5% Poor	Read 236 Write 203 Mixed 180 SusWrite 66.3 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 3.5 22% 7.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 1 36% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 97%
JMicron 4TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 122 87 128 135 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 99.5 Write 136 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 111 142% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 0.9 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 377 11% 377 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	39x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	39x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16