Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 155
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 316
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 30.2
19% 24.1 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 12.6
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 126 100 77 86 88 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.8% Above average
Read 240
Write 139
Mixed 208
SusWrite 103
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 33.4
122% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 60
60% 101 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 104%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
111GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 61.7
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 59.3
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MK6476GSX 640GB
51GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 40.5
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3X2G1600C8 029E CM3X2G1600C8 029E CM3X2G1600C8 Kingston ACR256X64D3U16C11G 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback