Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 189 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 330 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% MSI(1462 2775) 3GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.2 Reflection 19 Parallax 31.2 20% 24.8 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 25.2 Splatting 12.7 14% 18.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80 7,194 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.r Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 247 Write 237 Mixed 84.6 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 33.4 120% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 60.1 84% 155 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 104%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 111GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 60 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 68.1 Write 57.8 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 59 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MK6476GSX 640GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 44GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 41 41 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 37.7 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 40.2 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CM3X2G1600C8 029E CM3X2G1600C8 029E CM3X2G1600C8 Kingston ACR256X64D3U16C11G 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,415x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,170x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,079x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	376x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	368x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	306x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16