HP Laptop 15-gw0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-gw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D1
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201012
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 68.5
33% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 290
25% 216 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 87D1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.26
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
0% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 43 57 8.8 36 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 90.7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 34.8
29% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-gw0xxx Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-gw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback