Lenovo 2992B4G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2992B4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 107
53% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 294
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 65.8
56% 69 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 65.9
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 194 158 22 95 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 233
Write 186
Mixed 194
SusWrite 138
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 13.7
52% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 35.9
47% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
104GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 12 10 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 104
Write 13.6
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 13.5
32% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2992B4G Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 2992B4G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback