Lenovo 2992B4G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2992B4G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 18:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 157
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 298
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 65.7
56% 68.7 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 65.9
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 215 212 233 235 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 232
Write 207
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 211
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
28% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 100%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
104GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 11 13 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 103
Write 13.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 13.8
31% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2992B4G Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 2992B4G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback