PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds) |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200527 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '23 at 14:53 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
96.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.3%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 121 126 129 129 127 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BL4G24C16U4B.8FB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 549x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 227x |
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 118x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 134x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 122x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $247 |