Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER G770 001
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 01:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 207
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 481
55% 431 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 75.4
Parallax 6.8
5% 29.5 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 8.4 177 255 40 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 769
Mixed 688
SusWrite 84.5
146% 658 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 49.2
156% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 218
209% 323 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 115%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 16.4
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback