Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 130
56% 91.6 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 481
42% 359 Pts
64-Core 1,322
82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Dell(1028 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 30.6
24% 28.4 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 27.1
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 333 330 322 226 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 2,245
Write 1,303
Mixed 945
SusWrite 338
266% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 44.7
146% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 242
191% 271 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 169%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
35GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,163
Write 888
Mixed 800
280% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 38.4
129% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 252
200% 286 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung MZ7WD960HMHP-000AZ 960GB
495GB free
Firmware: DXV8DW3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 379 376 378 378 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 307
Write 408
Mixed 333
SusWrite 370
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 27.6
90% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 282
201% 258 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 98%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 11.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 332 333 323 329 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 352
Mixed 118
SusWrite 322
228% 314 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.6
776% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 226%
Great: 317%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 32TB
30TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 157
Write 9.7
Mixed 17
SusWrite 7.8
40% 48 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
116% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 41.4
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 16.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 116%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback