Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_R521FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_R521FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FL
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 171
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 241
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 11BF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 6.2
5% 9.67 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 360 349 407 398 409 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 432
Write 374
Mixed 373
SusWrite 377
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 29.4
119% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 120
130% 214 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 8502 PSD416G266681S 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.1% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 19
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_R521FL Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_R521FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback