HP 27-a109

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 27-a109  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B7
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 11:30
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 194
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 454
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
HP(103C 81B7) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
7.75% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 9
Parallax 9.7
8% 9.53 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.75%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 11 11 19 21 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 133
Write 115
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 21.1
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
413% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 27-a109 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 27-a109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback