Lenovo 3209C49

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3209C49  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120807
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 06:42
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 462
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.8% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 103
Parallax 93.5
76% 96.5 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 95.1
76% 92.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 75 10 12 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 158
Write 90.6
Mixed 141
SusWrite 69.7
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 21.2
73% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 27.7
25% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
687GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 75 12 12 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 167
Write 166
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 72.2
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209C49 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209C49

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback