MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '17 at 16:24
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 606
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.2
58% 68.9 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 56.4
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
133GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 420
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 40.3
138% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 93.7
105% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 480
Mixed 497
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 37.5
127% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 108
115% 192 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 198
Mixed 173
138% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.33
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 87.9
Write 95.2
Mixed 85.7
67% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.2
72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 67%
Drobo 5D 70.5TB
7TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 212
Write 177
Mixed 151
223% 180 MB/s
4K Read 4.06
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.11
206% 3.22 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 115%
Drobo 5D 6.5TB
4TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 211
Mixed 118
226% 184 MB/s
4K Read 3.07
4K Write 4.75
4K Mixed 1.78
234% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 94%
LaCie d2 Quadra v3 3TB
923GB free, PID 104c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 123
Write 122
Mixed 61.1
126% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.27
51% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback