HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 9 days ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 03:05
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 165
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 438
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 79.7
65% 78.6 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 58.5
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 349 356 362 364 364 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 243
Mixed 308
SusWrite 336
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 28.2
91% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 196
175% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 103%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
929GB free
Firmware: 01.01V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 103
SusWrite 125
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback