HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory49.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 21:29
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 5220
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
69% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 179
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 654
58% 492 Pts
64-Core 1,896
117% 1,896 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200
Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 12.8
11% 14.4 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 13
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1087 912 981 1009 989 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2,180
Mixed 1,806
SusWrite 1,078
399% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 68.9
237% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 573
437% 601 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 248%
Great: 334%
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
281GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1190 844 845 845 848 846 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2023
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 903
380% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.3
240% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 813
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 574
440% 608 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 238%
Great: 288%
MB4000GVYZK 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 202
Write 45.7
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 45.7
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 117%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$142
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 123 123 126 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 108%
KINGSTON SEDC450R960G 960GB
190GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
Read 38
Write 41.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 42
56% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 13.5
942% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 14.4
1,152% 14.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GR7AJR4N-WM 2x31.5GB
2 of 6 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 17.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 9.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback