Pcspecialist PULSAR PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 347%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics288% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive520% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcspecialist PULSAR PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 19:08
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$277
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 226
2-Core 446
130% 252 Pts
4-Core 890
8-Core 1,661
152% 1,276 Pts
64-Core 3,167
196% 3,167 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 126%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Zotac(19DA 1702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
288% Outstanding
Lighting 430
Reflection 416
Parallax 430
351% 425 fps
MRender 538
Gravity 362
Splatting 261
302% 387 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 288%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3520 4009 3513 1813 1828 1833 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
520% Outstanding
Read 2688
Write 4,833
Mixed 3168
SusWrite 2,753
763% 3,360 MB/s
4K Read 87
4K Write 378
4K Mixed 137
508% 201 MB/s
DQ Read 2,098
DQ Write 1,872
DQ Mixed 2,021
1,506% 1,997 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 520%
Great: 508%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 147 145 147 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 76.1
MC Write 71.2
MC Mixed 67.5
205% 71.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 32.6
103% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 183%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PULSAR PRO Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 236%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist PULSAR PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback