Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3240 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 59
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 139
54% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 175
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 206
Write 120
Mixed 136
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 24.8
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.9
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 35.2
33% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
Seagate ST3750840SCE 750GB
683GB free
Firmware: 3.ACD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.4
Write 73.8
Mixed 48.6
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-057.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.8
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 6 60 18.5" 1366 768 GSM4C18 19EN33
Typical GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2 Builds (Compare 1,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback