MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP63 Leopard 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 552
64% 495 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 63.9
53% 67.3 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 64.6
53% 65 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,587
Write 1344
Mixed 1,068
296% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 50.5
161% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 599
441% 584 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
582GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 73.1
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 107
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback